The Importance of Animal Rights to Human Survival

DogMany people claim to love animals. Some are indifferent, and some hate them. I’m not going to tell people they have to love other living creatures, but what I will say is that animals need to be protected for our own good. If there’s no love there, there’s no point in appealing to the ‘softer side’ of a person’s nature, so I’ll phrase the argument in a way that even those people will understand. Why should even non-animal lovers care what happens to the other living creatures around them? Here’s why:

In studies conducted in the United states, 90% of serial killers started out by torturing and killing animals. In similar studies conducted in Australia, 100% of serial killers admitted to torturing and killing animals before turning to their human victims. Psychology Today discusses issues here with regard to childhood behaviours toward animals, and what parents should do to intervene. The long and short of it is, any child over the age of six (who is not developmentally delayed), should be well aware that it is wrong to cause harm to animals – parents should get immediate professional help if their child is doing so…if for no other reason than the fact that they will almost always exhibit other harmful behaviours toward themselves and others.

Whatever the discrepancies in statistics, it’s clear that the vast majority of serial killers tortured animals as children. Often they were abused as children, and then turned the abuse on the animals. No matter how you look at it, people who get enjoyment out of hurting animals lack empathy. People without empathy will not hesitate to hurt human beings. Not every animal abuser turns into a serial killer, but they do often become abusive to their spouses and children.

Envision Counselling and Support Centre Inc. in Saskatchewan, Canada, has some helpful statistics to illustrate the connection between animal and human abuse. The three most alarming are these:

  • 88% of pets living in households with family violence are either abused or killed
  • 57% of survivors of family violence have had a pet killed by their abuser
  • Up to 70% of animal abusers also have records for other crimes

Similar statistics are reported by the ASPCA here.

It doesn’t take a degree in psychology to understand that people who lack empathy do not care about anything outside themselves. They are egocentric in the worst possible way, and cannot relate to pain experienced outside that sphere. There is little difference to them whether their victim is an animal or human, aside from the increased likelihood of being caught and punished for crimes against a human being.

Crimes against animals are treated lightly throughout the world, and that includes the so-called developed nations. There is a disconnect somewhere along the line, where law-makers are ignoring the results of allowing those guilty of animal cruelty to get off with warnings, small fines, and the proverbial slap on the wrist. Occasionally they will be banned from owning specific types of animals, but that’s generally the extent of the punishment.

Much of the damage done by abusers and serial killers is about power. It’s the same when it comes to rapists or any criminal who preys on those who are vulnerable. They’re attempting to put themselves into a position of power and control. Murder is, in fact, the ultimate in control over another person. As has been stated in multiple public service announcements, abuse is not a loss of control; it’s an attempt to regain control. The perpetrator feels powerless and weak. Killing and abusing makes them feel strong.

Until we change the legislation and demand harsher penalties for animal abuse, we leave ourselves wide open to this kind of societal damage. It won’t put a complete stop to these types of crimes, but it will certainly serve as a red flag – particularly to law enforcement when they’re investigating abuse and murder. There has been some demand by citizens in various places for an animal abuse registry. Not just to prevent crimes against humans, but also to prevent these people from adopting animals from shelters.

Harsher punishments are insufficient to prevent problems in the future, though. Mandatory counselling is a vital part of sentencing. The majority of people whose issues are pushing them toward cruelty toward animals, are victims themselves. The anger, frustration and powerlessness that compels them almost always comes from damage inflicted on them by someone else in a position of power over them.

Even with harsher sentences and mandatory counselling, we’re not going to put a stop to all of these kinds of crimes. No system is perfect, and quite frankly, often it’s too late. By the time a child is so damaged that they’re hurting animals, it becomes almost impossible to reverse that damage. It takes work and vigilance to save even one of these children. The kids who are setting the family dog on fire are most often the ones that are being molested, emotionally or physically abused, or neglected. This treatment isolates them mentally and emotionally. They build up defenses to protect themselves, and quite often those defenses render them incapable of any kind of emotional response. Without that, it’s very hard to reach them.

All we can really do is try. For those who wish to take some action, World Society for the Protection of Animals has a petition that you can sign here. They are calling for a Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare to be backed by the United Nations.

It boils down to self-preservation for some people, but as long as the message gets across it doesn’t matter how the dots are connected.

Rain Stickland
Follow Rain

Rain Stickland

Rain Stickland is a Canadian writer and producer, who is overly fond of ferrets and other furry creatures.
Rain Stickland
Follow Rain
Rain Stickland

About Rain Stickland

Rain Stickland is a Canadian writer and producer, who is overly fond of ferrets and other furry creatures.
Tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to The Importance of Animal Rights to Human Survival

  1. Nice article Rain!

    What bothers me about Joni E. Johnston’s theory on the subject is the fact she appears to be believe children under the age of six aren’t responsible which I think is odd. Most children over the age of one-two can be taught not to harm animals. They may not be able to understand the ‘why’, but they can certainly be taught to be kinder.

    There’s nothing worse than seeing an animal abused because they simply cannot cry out for help.

    What’s really interesting about the connection between animal abuse and cruelty in general is the fact newer studies have a different view.

    I have very limited knowledge on the subject so I can’t really comment on the accuracy of either, but you might want to take a look at the PT article of 9/23/2013 piece by Hal Herzog, Ph.D and see what you think.

    Have a good day Rain,

    Pat

    • I haven’t yet taken a look at it, but hopefully I’ll get to it. I took something else from the article you mention, though. The author didn’t say children couldn’t be taught not to hurt animals. It was more that they wouldn’t understand the reason why – as in they had a hard time understanding that animals feel pain, or what suffering really is. It’s not like a decent parent is going to demonstrate on their child what it feel like to have your hair pulled out or get poked in the eye, much less what it’s like to be cut with a knife or something. Children develop empathy, but they are very self-centric in their early years usually. Some develop empathy at a very early age, but it’s uncommon enough that people remark on it.

      • Rain, not that it makes any difference, but following is the statement I was referencing:

        “The Experimenter: (ages 1-6 or developmentally delayed). This is usually a preschool child who has not developed the cognitive maturity to understand that animals have feelings are not to be treated as toys. This may be the child’s first pet or s/he doesn’t have a lot of experience or training on how to take care of a variety of animals.”

        I had the impression that when she was talking about ‘why’, she was referring to parents not understanding ‘why’ their children were abusive towards the animals.

        Maybe I misunderstood.

        Have a good day,

        Pat

  2. Steve KovacsSteve Kovacs says:

    Great stats, info and article! Very nice.

  3. You can unquestionably go to your commitment while in the get the job done you write. The actual segment desires a lot more passionate copy writers just like you that are not worried to convey the direction they imagine. At all times comply with the cardiovascular system.

  4. Helen says:

    This is not animal RIGHTS. Being nice to animals is animal welfare, which is important. Animal rights activists (such as PETA) are radical groups with no backing from professional groups (eg vets) advocate animal rights (look this up for more info on the craziness they condone) and with whom you probably don’t wish to be associated with…. FYI 🙂

    • It’s your opinion and you’re free to couch it in whatever terms you like. However, animals are afforded certain protections under law, which to me are rights by legal definition. I would like to see them have more rights under the law. My use of the language is not altered by groups operating in fashions that I may, or may not, approve of. An activist is a different definition, separate from the term ‘rights’ and may be associated with a certain stigma. Maybe a preferable term would be ‘advocates’ depending on your viewpoint. Those who fight for the rights and protections of animals are not all radicals, just like feminists are not all radicals. When people do not fight for their freedoms and protections, however, they lose them. (As the expression goes – the only rights you have, are those which you are willing to stand up for.) My only quibble with PETA is their use/subjugation of women, seeing as I am also a feminist. It’s one thing when women choose to appear naked in public. It’s another thing entirely when they are shown chained up in ads, hanging from hooks. It’s not as though PETA is a terrorist group that is killing people. I’m fully aware of the group and a lot of what they do, including falsifying their personal information to get jobs in various labs and agribusinesses in order to take video footage and document animal treatment. Probably a good portion of what they do there is illegal, breaking privacy laws, and is also quite likely inadmissible in court, so other than bombarding the public with some pretty horrific images, they’re not accomplishing very much. I do believe animals need to be fully protected from the humans who torture them. I think their treatment is abominable, and I will continue to call that fighting for their rights, because it’s the rights I hope they attain in the future, and the rights I hope are protected.

  5. alice says:

    great information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Recent Articles Posted

    • How to Survive Mass Shootings
      At our self-defense school, the Mayfield Academy of Self-Defense, we not only train in hand to hand self-defense but quite often practice defenses against knives, guns and active shooting situations. Not cutesy unrealistic techniques that some schools have been known to teach but basic and realistic moves that are the ...
    • Black Lives Really Mattering and My Friend the Boxer
      I taught college Criminal Justice, on a part-time basis for about a decade. Out of about 6 of those years, I taught in downtown Cleveland in an area where especially at night, wasn’t very safe. During that time, I became friends with a parking lot attendant and former professional boxer, ...
    • Meaning—Makes the Man and Woman–Makes the Difference
      When I was a police supervisor in my 40’s, a young patrol officer who also happened to be my friend asked me what I thought about growing up in the 70’s. Jeff, had heard there was a lot of non-committal free love going on back in the day and also ...
    • Bars, Demonstrations, and Getting Thumped…
      Many people believe that they’ll be safe going to bars into the wee hours of the morning. I'm having fun! After all, they’re not looking for trouble and things should be fine. Moreover, some people feel that they can go to demonstrations no matter what it’s about or who the ...
    • White Privilege, the Latest Distraction
      I was watching a video clip on Facebook where an African American woman was talking about white privilege. She was brow beating a white, Jewish male trying to get him to agree with what has taken off as the new buzz word regarding African Americans in America—white-privilege. The male tried ...
    • Every Day A Child Cries and Sometimes Dies—It Can Stop
      Your son looks so innocent when he pets your dog and looks into its eyes. The innocence and love you see brings a tear to your eye.   And those special times that he comes up to you to share some new excitement in his life and you notice that ...
    • Who Do You Trust? Who Do You Respect? Politics, Media and You
      What active local or national politician do you respect and trust? That’s a question I often ask people when they start discussing the state of politics in the country. I don’t have a problem with anyone talking politics or even ranting about it as long as they don’t drift too ...
    • Sitting and Staring–The Andy Griffith Show-Mayberry 2017 and What Really Matters
      I was having a snack and watching TV when my 10 year old niece walked into the room and blurted out, “Wow! You ARE old. You’re watching black and white TV!” I glanced up at her and then back to the TV and exclaimed, “You’ve never watched Andy of Mayberry! ...
    • How to Have Great Talks and Presentations
      What makes for a good communicator, teacher or speech maker? While talking, personally, I’m never at a loss for words. I know some people who know me are probably shaking their heads a bit, saying, “You certainly can say that again Steve, because you certainly do talk a lot! I ...
    • The Hypocrisy in My Fellow Lefties Needs to Stop
      I suppose many would say I'm not a true-blue leftist, and they would be right...no pun intended. I have many views that are very liberal, and yet I maintain that we desperately need to stop being dependent on government for everything. In many ways I'm what was originally meant by ...